New Public Management (NPM) is a management philosophy and approach that advocates for applying private-sector business principles and practices to the public sector to improve efficiency, accountability, and effectiveness in government operations.
Introduction
In the realm of public administration and governance, the concept of New Public Management (NPM) emerged as a transformative phase aimed at making governments more responsive to their citizens. It sought to revolutionize the public sector by incorporating market principles of efficiency and economy. The term New Public Management was first coined by Christopher Hood in 1991 in his book – “Public Management for all seasons?”. He considered NPM as “marriage of opposites”.
The roots of New Public Management can be traced back to the Minnowbrook Conference II in 1988, under the chairmanship of H. George Fredrickson. This pivotal event laid the foundation for NPM, and its proceedings were documented in “Public Management in the Interconnected World: Essays in the Minnow Brook Tradition” (1990), edited by Richard T. Mayor and published by Timmy Bailey.
Further Nicholas Henry, in his book “Public administration and Public affairs” identified five fundamentals of NPM: Alertness, Agility, Adaptability, Alignment, and Accountability. Even Patrick Dunleavy classified NPM into three components: Disaggregation, Competition and Incentivization.
Now let’s delve deeper into the essence of NPM and study the transforming nature of the approach in detail.
Table of Contents
The Surge in Popularity
From the 1990s onwards, Western nations witnessed a surge in the popularity of restructuring their public sectors to operate more like the private sector. This shift aimed to enhance the efficiency and quality of services provided by the government to the public. NPM introduced several key features to achieve these objectives:
Organizational Revamping: This involved simplifying bureaucratic structures and flattening hierarchies to streamline decision-making.
Citizen Empowerment: NPM recognized citizens as active customers rather than passive recipients of services, encouraging greater citizen involvement in governance.
Autonomy for Managers: Public sector managers were granted greater autonomy in decision-making to improve responsiveness.
Performance Measurement: NPM introduced performance measurement techniques and indicators to assess the effectiveness of public services.
Cost-Cutting: Inspired by New Right philosophy, cost-cutting measures were implemented to reduce wastage of resources.
User-Pay Basis: The delivery of services shifted toward a user-pay basis, where citizens paid for the services they received.
Outsourcing and Contracting Out: Services were outsourced and contracted out to private entities to increase efficiency.
Decentralization: Governance was decentralized to bring decision-making closer to local communities.
Changing Nomenclature
Under NPM, new terms like “managers,” “customers,” and “service providers” became associated with the functioning of the public sector. The aim was to replace the sheltered, inefficient bureaucracy with a more efficient, responsible, transparent, and accountable service provider.
The publication of “REINVENTING GOVERNMENT: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector” by Osborne and Gaebler in 1992 played a significant role in redefining the functions of government based on NPM ideals. The authors advocated for the concept of ‘entrepreneurial government,’ which emphasized innovative approaches to governance.
Factors Driving the Development of NPM
Several factors contributed to the development of New Public Management:
Receding Credibility of the State: In the 1970s, the inefficiency of state governance came under scrutiny worldwide.
New Right Philosophy: The philosophy has inspired the principles and features of NPM. The new right philosophy promotes free market, radical right, Thatcherism, Reaganomics, libertarianism, rolling back of the state from non-essential and unnecessary services i.e. reducing wastage of resources. It thus supported privatization, deregulation, increasing the role of the market in delivery of public services and goods etc.
Post-Wilsonian and Post-Weberian Concepts: Traditional notions of efficiency, rigid hierarchy, and the politics-administration dichotomy gave way to a focus on democratic, transparent, and citizen-friendly administration.
Administrative Changes in Western Countries: Western nations embarked on structural transformations to make their public administration more adaptable, citizen-centric, and aligned with market principles.
Overall, New Public Management, born out of the need for more efficient and responsive governance, has left an indelible mark on the way governments operate. By borrowing market principles and embracing innovation, NPM has reshaped public administration into a more accountable and citizen-oriented entity, setting the stage for modern governance in the interconnected world.
Administration in the era of Liberalization and Globalization
In the wake of New Public Management (NPM), a new era of governance has emerged, driven by digitalization and the Information Communication and Technology (ICT) revolution. This digital-era governance seeks to reintegrate government responsibilities in a technologically advanced landscape. Moreover, globalization has ushered in a transformative wave in public administration, shifting its nature and scope towards a more adaptable, collaborative, and less hierarchical discipline grounded in networks and cooperation.
The Impact of Globalization
Contrary to diminishing the role of public administration, globalization has compelled it to become more proactive and collaborative. Public administration adapted to this globalized world by embracing civil society, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the private sector to facilitate the delivery of public goods and services. Essentially, globalization has transformed public administration from an enabler to a facilitator, responding to evolving global challenges and opportunities.
Minnowbrook Conference III: A Global Perspective
The Minnowbrook Conference III, held in 2008 at Blue Mountain Lake and Lake Placid, took place against the backdrop of a declining American economy and the early effects of global terrorism. The conference shifted its focus towards global concerns, including terrorism, economic imbalances, and ecological challenges. It also delved into the roles of various stakeholders and interest groups in decision-making processes, emphasizing the significance of e-governance and the benefits of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) paradigm in enhancing administrative efficiency and effectiveness.
A Call for Structural and Functional Reforms
Minnowbrook Conference III centered on structural and functional reforms, often referred to as second-generation reforms. The conference’s proceedings were published in “The Future of Public Administration Around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective,” chaired by Rosemary O’Leary. Participants at the conference recognized the interdisciplinary nature of public administration in the context of globalization, acknowledging that it is no longer confined to national boundaries. Cross-national studies became pivotal in reimagining public administration, emphasizing the need for comparative studies to redefine the field.
Continuous Reform and Collaborative Governance
Participants at Minnowbrook Conference III emphasized that reforming public administration is an ongoing process, highlighting the need for continuous adaptation. A central theme that emerged was the importance of ‘collaborative governance’ as an effective defense against government inertia and bureaucratic delays. This concept underscores the significance of meaningful coordination among various institutions involved in decision-making and implementation, thereby ensuring efficient and effective governance in a rapidly changing global landscape.
Conclusion
The era of liberalization and globalization has redefined the role of public administration, necessitating adaptation to new challenges and collaborative approaches. Digital-era governance and global interconnectedness have transformed public administration into a dynamic and responsive discipline, emphasizing the importance of continuous reform and collaboration to meet the needs of an evolving world.
Read More:
