An electoral system is a set of rules and procedures used to determine how representatives are chosen in a democracy, typically involving methods like first-past-the-post or proportional representation to allocate seats based on votes cast. The specific system used can greatly impact the fairness and outcomes of elections.
Introduction
The electoral system is the backbone of any democracy. It’s the mechanism that determines how individuals and political parties secure their seats in government based on the votes they receive. In simpler terms, it’s the process of translating votes into seats.
Table of Contents
Let’s delve into some common electoral systems, starting with Majoritarian System:
Majoritarian System
A majoritarian electoral system is a method where candidates or parties who secure the most votes in each electoral district or constituency win representation. There are various types of majoritarian systems, including:
First Past the Post System: A Simple Majority
The “First Past the Post” system, often referred to as the relative majority or simple plurality system, operates on a straightforward principle. In this system, the candidate with the highest number of votes is declared the winner, even if they don’t secure a majority of votes. For instance, if three candidates receive 40%, 35%, and 25% of the votes, respectively, the candidate with 40% wins the seat. This system is prevalent in countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, and India.
One criticism of the majoritarian system is that it can lead to situations where candidates win elections without receiving more than half of the total votes. This can be seen as a violation of the democratic principle of majority rule, where the candidate with over 50% of the votes should ideally win.
Second Ballot System: Two Round System
To address the issue of securing an absolute majority, some countries employ the Second Ballot System. In this method, if no candidate receives more than 50% of the votes in the initial round, a second ballot is conducted, and the winner is the candidate with the most votes. A drawback here is that this approach might require multiple rounds of voting, making it impractical for larger-scale elections. France’s electoral system for the National Assembly is a prime example of this method. Other Examples are Haiti, Cuba and Egypt etc.
Alternative Vote System
The Alternative Vote, also known as Instant Runoff Voting (IRV), is a preferential voting system used in single-member electoral districts, such as those in many parliamentary systems.
In the AV system, voters rank candidates in order of preference. Instead of voting for just one candidate, voters indicate their first choice, second choice, third choice, and so on, for as many candidates as they like. When the votes are counted, if a candidate receives an absolute majority (more than 50% of the first-preference votes), they are declared the winner. If no candidate receives an absolute majority, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated. The votes for the eliminated candidate are redistributed to the remaining candidates based on the second preferences of those voters.
This process continues until one candidate receives an absolute majority, making them the winner. The AV system is designed to ensure that the winning candidate has broader support and is more acceptable to a majority of voters, as they need to have more than 50% of the votes to win. This system is used in Australia and for Irish President.
Limited Vote Plan: Flexibility for Voters
Limited Vote System invented by political scientist Steven J. Brams. The Limited Vote Plan, also known as Approval Voting, introduces a unique concept. Instead of limiting voters to a single preferred candidate, this system allows voters to cast their votes for as many candidates as they like, within a set limit. For example, in an election with five seats, voters can vote for one, two, three, or four of the candidates but not all five. This has been adopted by several private associations.
Condorcet Method: Defeating All Challengers
The Condorcet Method, named after the Marquis de Condorcet, asks voters to choose between each pair of candidates. The winner is the candidate who defeats all others in these pairwise contests. For example, when there are three candidates – A, B, and C- voters are asked to choose between A and B, between A and C, and between B and C. For instance, if a majority of the voters prefers A to B and also A to C, candidate A wins.
Drawbacks of Majoritarian Systems
One of the serious shortcomings of the majoritarian electoral system has been that when an entire legislature is elected by majoritarian methods, large parties tend to be favored. The reason is that in each single-member constituency the candidates of small parties do not have much of a chance to be elected.
Hence majoritarian elections tend to yield considerable disproportionality between votes cast and seats won as a result of the overrepresentation of the largest parties and the underrepresentation of small parties.
Proportional Representation System
Proportional representation (PR) is a notable electoral system that came into being in the nineteenth century and gained popularity in various European democracies in the early twentieth century. The primary motivation behind adopting PR is to address the imbalances and disproportionalities inherent in majoritarian systems, aiming to establish a closer relationship between the votes cast and the seats won. Here we’ll explore different PR systems, including the Single Transferable Vote System, List System, Semi-proportional Method, Slate System, and the Cumulative Vote System.
Single Transferable Vote System: Preferential Voting
The Single Transferable Vote System, often known as the Hare System due to its originator Thomas Hare, operates on the principle of preferential voting. In this system, voters indicate their preferences for multiple candidates on the ballot paper. However, they have only one vote. This system is employed in multiple-member constituencies, where more than one representative is elected from a single district. The process begins by dividing the total votes by the number of seats plus one, then adding one to the quotient, forming the “quota.” A candidate must receive a number of votes equal to the quota to secure a seat. Candidates with the fewest votes are eliminated one by one, and their votes are transferred according to the voters’ second or third preferences.
The Single Transferable Vote System is used in elections to the Indian Rajya Sabha, state legislative councils, the Senate of Australia, and parliamentary elections in Malta and Ireland.
List System: Party-Centric Approach
The List System is another PR method used in multiple-member constituencies. In this system, political parties compile lists of candidates, with each list consisting of as many candidates as the number of seats to be filled. Voters cast their votes for a party rather than individual candidates. The quota is determined by dividing the total number of votes by the number of seats. The seats are then allocated to parties based on their proportion of the vote.
Semi-proportional Method: Combining PR and Majoritarian Elements
The semi-proportional method is a unique approach that combines elements of proportional representation with majoritarian principles. One example of this system is the single nontransferable vote method used in Japan, where voters in multi-member districts have one vote, and the candidates with the most votes are elected. For instance, a party with slightly more than 20 per cent support that nominates one candidate in a four-member district is assured of getting this candidate elected, without the use of a formal proportional representation system. This system makes it relatively easy for minority parties to gain representation.
Slate System: Electoral College Elections in the USA
The Slate System is a distinct approach used in the election of the American President’s Electoral College. In this system, different parties put forward their lists, known as “slates,” and voters cast their votes for a slate, not individual candidates. The slate that receives the majority of votes is declared elected in its entirety, which can result in a majoritarian outcome. Thus, if 51% voters in California vote for Democratic Slate, all the 54 Democrats will be elected and none of the Republicans will get in. This may be described as a variety of majoritarian methods.
Cumulative Vote System: Empowering Minority Groups
The Cumulative Vote System is a semi-proportional method that allows minority groups, whether based on race, language, or other criteria, to pool their votes in favor of one candidate. In this system, voters have multiple votes, which they can allocate as they see fit. The candidates with the highest number of votes are elected. Thus, if ten members are to be elected from one constituency, the voters have ten votes which they may use the way they like. A voter may cast one vote each for ten different candidates or 5 each for two candidates, or all the 10 votes for one candidate. The voter writes the number of votes given for a candidate. The ten with the maximum number of votes get elected.
Overall, Proportional representation systems aim to provide a more balanced and representative form of governance, particularly in multi-member constituencies. These systems address the shortcomings of majoritarian systems by ensuring that the allocation of seats in government more closely aligns with the preferences of voters. Each PR system offers unique advantages and challenges, making them important considerations for democratic societies seeking fair and proportional representation in their decision-making processes.
Electoral System in India – Mixed Electoral System
India follows a federal parliamentary system with a multi-tiered electoral process. The electoral system in India is based on the principles of universal suffrage and direct representation. The country is divided into parliamentary constituencies for the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and legislative constituencies for the State Assemblies.
The President is indirectly elected by an Electoral College consisting of elected members of both houses of Parliament and the State Legislative Assemblies. Members of the Lok Sabha are directly elected by eligible voters through a first-past-the-post system, while the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) is made up of members appointed by the State Assemblies. State Assemblies also follow the first-past-the-post system.
The Election Commission of India oversees the electoral process, ensuring free and fair elections. India’s diverse and complex electoral system is a reflection of its commitment to democracy, with a blend of direct and indirect elections, ensuring representation at both the national and state levels.
Conclusion
Understanding different electoral systems is crucial for anyone interested in the workings of a democracy. Each system has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to implement can significantly impact the representation and functioning of a country’s government. As the political landscape continues to evolve, so do the discussions around electoral systems and the pursuit of fair and representative governance.
Read More:
