New Economic Policy

The New Economic Policy aims to liberalize and rejuvenate the economy through market-oriented reforms while maintaining state control over key sectors, fostering a mixed economy model.

New Economic Policy 


The economic landscape of post-independence India was shaped by a confluence of historical factors, ideological inclinations, and pragmatic aspirations. The leaders of newly-independent India, deeply influenced by the country’s colonial past and inspired by socialist principles, envisioned a unique economic trajectory. However, the pursuit of a mixed economy model, characterized by state intervention and protectionism, encountered formidable challenges, ultimately leading to a watershed moment in 1991.

Pre-1991 Economic Scenario:

Following independence, India’s economic policies were deeply influenced by its colonial past, which Indian leaders perceived as exploitative, and by their exposure to Fabian socialism. Leaders like Nehru envisioned an alternative to the extremes of capitalism and socialism, aiming for a socialist society that embraced both a strong public sector and private property within a democratic framework. This vision was realized through a centralized planning approach.

The economic policy of post-independence India leaned towards protectionism, emphasizing import substitution and industrialization under state supervision. State intervention extended to micro-level control in various sectors, including labor and financial markets. The public sector played a significant role in the economy, alongside stringent business regulations. Overall, the policy framework aimed to foster self-sufficiency and promote equitable economic development in the nascent Indian state.

Drawbacks of Pre-1991 economic policy:

During the period between 1947 and 1990, India operated under a system known as the “Licence Raj” or “Permit Raj.” This elaborate system comprised a web of licenses, regulations, and bureaucratic red tape that were mandatory for establishing and operating businesses in the country. The Licence Raj significantly impeded entrepreneurial activity, stifled innovation, and led to inefficiencies in the economy.

Import substitution industrialization (ISI) was a key economic policy pursued during this time. ISI aimed to reduce reliance on foreign imports by promoting domestic production of industrial goods. The rationale behind ISI was to enhance self-reliance and insulate the economy from external shocks. However, the implementation of ISI led to the monopolization of Indian industries and a lack of competitive pressure to improve product quality. Consequently, consumers were often left with limited choices and substandard goods, undermining their interests and satisfaction.

The 1991 Economic Crisis:

By 1985, India’s economy began experiencing significant balance of payments challenges. These issues stemmed from a scenario where government expenditure exceeded generated income. Additionally, there were considerable disparities between income and expenditure, exacerbating the financial strain on the country.

By the end of 1990, India found itself in the throes of a severe economic crisis. The government was perilously close to defaulting on its financial obligations, with its central bank refusing to extend further credit. This precarious situation underscored the gravity of the economic challenges facing the nation.

In 1991, India encountered a full-blown economic crisis, primarily driven by external debt obligations. The government found itself unable to fulfill repayment commitments on borrowings from foreign sources. Compounding the crisis, India’s foreign exchange reserves, essential for importing critical commodities like petroleum, plummeted to alarmingly low levels. These reserves were insufficient to sustain the country’s import requirements for even a fortnight, highlighting the acute nature of the crisis.

Furthermore, the economic turmoil was exacerbated by a surge in the prices of essential goods, intensifying the burden on households and exacerbating inflationary pressures. The convergence of these factors created a perfect storm of economic distress, necessitating urgent and comprehensive intervention to stabilize the economy and chart a path toward recovery.

Advent of IMF and World Bank:

In response to the dire economic situation in 1991, India turned to international financial institutions for assistance, including the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), commonly known as the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These institutions provided crucial support to India in the form of a $7 billion loan to help address the crisis and stabilize the economy.

As part of the agreement with the IMF, India pledged significant amounts of gold reserves to secure the loan. Specifically, India committed 20 tonnes of gold to the Union Bank of Switzerland and 47 tonnes to the Bank of England. This collateralization of gold reserves served as a guarantee for the IMF’s financial assistance and underscored the seriousness of India’s commitment to implementing necessary reforms.

However, the assistance from the IMF came with conditions attached. In exchange for the bailout funds, the IMF expected India to embark on a path of economic liberalization and open up its economy to international markets. This entailed removing trade restrictions and barriers between India and other countries, thereby facilitating greater integration into the global economy. These structural adjustments were seen as essential steps to address the underlying vulnerabilities in India’s economy and set it on a path toward sustainable growth and development.

Stabilization Measures:

In response to the severe economic crisis of 1991, India swiftly implemented a series of short-term stabilization measures. These actions were aimed at rectifying the immediate causes of the crisis, focusing primarily on addressing weaknesses in the balance of payments and controlling inflation.

Structural Measures:

Simultaneously, the Indian government embarked on a comprehensive agenda of long-term structural reforms. These measures were designed to fundamentally reshape the Indian economy, enhancing its efficiency and international competitiveness by dismantling long standing rigidities across various sectors.


Under the broad umbrella of liberalization, the Indian government undertook a multitude of reforms touching upon various sectors:

  1. Deregulation of Industrial Sectors: The complex system of industrial licensing, which had long constrained economic activity, was dismantled for all but a few critical product categories. Sectors such as alcohol, cigarettes, hazardous chemicals, drugs, and explosives retained licensing requirements. Additionally, several industries previously reserved exclusively for the public sector were opened up to private investment. Price determination was gradually shifted from government control to market forces, fostering competition and efficiency.
  1. Financial Sector Reforms: Efforts were made to reduce the regulatory burden on the financial sector, transitioning the role of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) from a strict regulator to a facilitator of financial activities. This shift paved the way for the establishment of private banks, increasing competition and innovation in the banking sector. The permissible limit for foreign direct investment (FDI) in banks was raised to 50%, attracting foreign capital and expertise. However, essential regulatory functions were retained by the RBI to safeguard the stability of the financial system and protect the interests of depositors.
  1. Tax Reforms: India embarked on a comprehensive overhaul of its tax system to foster investment and economic growth. Corporate tax rates, which had been prohibitively high, were gradually reduced to encourage business expansion and entrepreneurship. Tax procedures were simplified, and rates were rationalized to provide clarity and transparency. The tax structure underwent a significant simplification process, with the number of tax slabs reduced from eleven in 1973-74 to three by 1990-91, promoting compliance and reducing administrative burden.
  1. Foreign Exchange Reforms: In a bid to bolster foreign exchange reserves and enhance export competitiveness, the Indian government opted for a devaluation of the rupee against major foreign currencies. This adjustment made Indian exports more competitive in international markets while encouraging inflows of foreign exchange. Additionally, the government relinquished control over foreign exchange rates, allowing market forces to determine exchange rates, thereby promoting efficiency and transparency in currency markets.
  1. Trade and Investment Policy Reforms: The Indian government pursued a comprehensive liberalization of trade and investment policies to integrate the Indian economy into the global marketplace. Quantitative restrictions on imports were progressively dismantled, promoting greater competition and consumer choice. Tariff rates on imports were reduced to foster trade and stimulate domestic industries to become more competitive. Licensing procedures for imports were streamlined, except for products deemed hazardous or environmentally sensitive. Subsequently, quantitative restrictions on imports were phased out entirely to facilitate freer movement of goods and services across borders. Export duties were eliminated to incentivise domestic producers to explore foreign markets, thereby promoting export-led growth and economic development.


Privatisation emerged as a key component of India’s economic reform agenda, aimed at enhancing efficiency, promoting modernisation, and attracting foreign investment. The transfer of assets from the public sector to the private sector was seen as a means to introduce market discipline, improve productivity, and unlock the latent potential of underperforming state-owned enterprises. Disinvestment, the process of selling equity stakes of public sector enterprises to private investors, was employed to mobilize resources, enhance accountability, and foster private sector participation in key industries. However, this policy faced criticism for its perceived undervaluation of public sector assets and concerns over the diversion of disinvestment proceeds towards bridging fiscal deficits rather than reinvestment in productive assets.


Globalization emerged as a defining feature of India’s economic transformation, facilitating greater integration with the global economy and unleashing new opportunities for growth and development. India embraced globalization as a means to expand its economic horizons, promote technological innovation, and enhance competitiveness in the international arena.


The phenomenon of outsourcing gained prominence as a consequence of globalization, with India emerging as a preferred destination for business process outsourcing (BPO) and other knowledge-based services. The availability of a skilled and English-speaking workforce, coupled with advancements in telecommunications and information technology, positioned India as a global hub for outsourcing activities. Key sectors such as IT services, customer support, finance, and healthcare witnessed significant growth due to outsourcing, contributing to India’s economic diversification and job creation.

World Trade Organization (WTO):

India’s active engagement with the World Trade Organization (WTO) underscored its commitment to multilateralism and international trade cooperation. As a member of the WTO, India sought to leverage its participation to expand market access, promote fair and equitable trade practices, and safeguard its interests in the global marketplace. The WTO provided a platform for India to negotiate trade agreements, resolve disputes, and pursue its economic development objectives within a rules-based framework. By adhering to WTO principles and agreements, India aimed to enhance its competitiveness, foster economic growth, and integrate more seamlessly into the global trading system.

Latest articles

Leave a Comment

You cannot copy content of this page