Feminist Perspectives in International Relations

Feminist perspectives in international relations critically analyze power structures, challenge gender biases, and strive for equality, inclusion, and the recognition of women’s agency in shaping global politics and policies.

Feminist Perspectives in International Relations


In the realm of International Relations, the feminist perspective has emerged as a transformative force, challenging conventional ideologies and advocating for the recognition of women’s rights. Marie Shear’s profound statement in 1986 encapsulates the essence of feminism: “Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.” While the roots of feminism can be traced back to the 18th century, it wasn’t until the 1980s that feminists started influencing the discourse in International Politics.

Feminist theory serves as a unique lens through which international relations are analyzed. It sheds light on aspects often overlooked by traditional approaches, exposing the inherent masculinity within realism, liberalism, and Marxism. This perspective contends that international relations, as a discipline, is inherently gender-biased, influencing analyses of global organizations.

Table of Contents

Basic Tenets of Feminism in International Relations:

  • Gender as a Social Issue: Feminism asserts that gender is a social construct, not a biological determinant.
  • Rejecting Male-Dominant Structures: Feminist theories challenge the prevailing male-dominated structures within International Relations.
  • Redefining National Interest: While national interest is inherently multi-dimensional, feminism argues that its definition has been historically shaped by masculine perspectives.
  • Unveiling the Hidden Role of Women: Feminism contends that women have been systematically overlooked in the analysis of international relations.
  • Victims of Male-Dominated Decision-Making: Women are portrayed as direct victims of decisions made predominantly by men in international relations, particularly in the context of war.
  • Gendered Ranking of International Issues: Feminist theories highlight the gendered manner in which international issues are ranked and addressed.
  • Pursuit of Equality: At its core, feminism in international relations advocates for political, economic, and social equality for women.

Examining International Politics through a ‘Gender’ Lens:

The feminist approach to International Relations aims to question the claimed gender neutrality that conceals embedded assumptions favoring masculine attributes such as power, autonomy, rationality, and the public sphere. This critical examination seeks to dismantle preconceived notions and establish a more inclusive and balanced perspective.

Feminists engaged in the discipline of International Politics are guided by the mantra, “The Personal is Political.” This slogan reflects their commitment to expanding the understanding of political dynamics to encompass personal experiences, thereby challenging traditional power structures.

Theories of Feminism

Liberal Feminism:

Liberal feminism focuses on addressing women’s subordination through the removal of legal obstacles, ultimately striving for gender equality. Within the realm of global politics, liberal feminism scrutinizes the participation of women in institutions and practices, examining how their contributions impact or are influenced by international policymaking.

Feminist Critical Theory:

Rooted in Gramscian Marxism, feminist critical theory delves into the manifestations of gendered identities and power dynamics within gender politics. Sandra Whitworth’s seminal work, ‘Feminism and International Relations’ (1994), contributes to this framework by critically analyzing the ways in which gender influences and is influenced by global political structures.

Feminist Social Constructivism:

This theory posits that ideas and gender play pivotal roles in shaping global politics. It emphasizes the reciprocal relationship between global politics and societal constructs of gender. Elizabeth Prugl’s work, ‘The Global Construction of Gender: Home-Based Work in the Political Economy of the 20th Century,’ exemplifies the application of feminist social constructivism in understanding the intersection of gender and political economy.

Feminist Post-structuralism:

Focusing on the interplay between knowledge and power, feminist post-structuralism critiques the foundations of knowledge predominantly based on men’s experiences. Charlotte Hooper’s ‘Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics’ (2001) contributes to this perspective, unraveling the complex relationships between masculinity, international relations, and power dynamics.

Postcolonial Feminists:

Post-colonial feminist theories argue that Western feminism often stems from the perspectives of privileged Western women. Chandra Mohanty’s ‘Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity’ (2003) emphasizes the need to address women’s subordination within their cultural contexts. This theory advocates for a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to feminist discourse.

Feminist Vs the Mainstream Perspective of International Relations

National Interest:

  • Mainstream Perspective: Defined predominantly in terms of power, the mainstream perspective sees national interest through a lens of strategic advantage and dominance.
  • Feminist Perspective: In contrast, the feminist perspective offers a more nuanced understanding, viewing national interest as multi-dimensional and contextual. It emphasizes that these interests may not always be antagonistic and highlights the complex interplay of various factors.

Inter-State Relations:

  • Mainstream Perspective: Inter-state relations are often perceived as gender-neutral within the mainstream view, focusing on diplomatic and strategic interactions devoid of gender considerations.
  • Feminist Perspective: Feminist perspectives, however, emphasize the highly gendered nature of inter-state relations. This viewpoint acknowledges the impact of gender on diplomatic exchanges and recognizes that gender dynamics play a crucial role in shaping international interactions.


  • Mainstream Perspective: Security in the mainstream perspective is equated with power, adhering to the belief that more power leads to enhanced security.
  • Feminist Perspective: The feminist viewpoint broadens the concept of security to encompass human security and environmental security. It challenges the notion that power domination is the sole guarantor of security, emphasizing collective endeavors, persuasion, and coalition-building.

War and Violence:

  • Mainstream Perspective: Wars are often considered gender-neutral in the mainstream view, with a focus on military strategies and geopolitics.
  • Feminist Perspective: Feminist perspectives argue that war is a male-dominated terrain, portraying men as protectors and defenders while casting women as individuals to be protected or relegated to backend services. Additionally, feminists highlight structural violence, encompassing domestic violence, racial abuse, chauvinism, and socio-economic disparities.

Role of State:

  • Mainstream Perspective: The role of the state is predominant in mainstream thinking, with an emphasis on state actors as the primary agents in resolving global issues.
  • Feminist Perspective: Feminist perspectives challenge this centrality, highlighting the role of non-state actors and diminishing the significance of the state in addressing contemporary global challenges. This shift underscores the importance of a more inclusive approach involving diverse actors.

Key Scholars

Judith Ann Tickner:

Most prominent feminist figure in the field of International Relations, J. Ann Tickner, criticized conventional international relations theorists for neglecting the inclusion of gender in both their theoretical frameworks and practical applications. Tickner went on to redefine Hans J. Morgenthau’s six principles, emphasizing:

  • The inherent partiality of objectivity, inherently associated with masculinity.
  • The multidimensional nature of national interest, resisting definition by a singular set of interests.
  • The acknowledgment that power, when linked to masculinity, perpetuates domination and privilege.
  • The potential for utilizing power as a means of collective empowerment on the global stage.
  • The recognition that all political actions carry moral significance, making the separation of politics and morality challenging.
  • The critique of narrowly defined political realms that exclude women, challenging the notion of politics as a solely masculine construct.

Tickner’s significant contributions are reflected in her books, including ‘Gender in International Relations’ (1992), ‘Gendering World Politics’ (2001), and ‘A Feminist Voyage through International Relations’ (2014).

Cynthia Enloe (1938):

Cynthia Enloe’s influential work explores the intricate connections between gender and international politics. Through her books, such as ‘Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics’ (1990) and ‘Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives’ (2000), Enloe critically examines the militarization of women’s lives and challenges conventional narratives. Her meticulous analysis has played a vital role in unraveling the complex web of gender dynamics within the realm of international relations.

Carol Cohn:

As the Founding Director of the Consortium on Gender, Security, and Human Rights, Carol Cohn has made indelible contributions to feminist scholarship. Her book, ‘Women and Wars: Contested Histories, Uncertain Futures’ (2013), delves into the contested history of women in wars, providing a nuanced perspective that challenges conventional narratives. Cohn’s work emphasizes the intricate relationship between gender, security, and human rights, contributing significantly to the evolving feminist discourse in International Relations.

Mary Wollstonecraft:

A luminary in feminist thought, Mary Wollstonecraft’s groundbreaking work, ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: With Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects’ (1792), laid the groundwork for feminist philosophy. Her writings championed the rights and equality of women in both political and moral spheres, establishing a foundational text that continues to inspire contemporary feminist discourse.

Laura Sjoberg:

Laura Sjoberg’s scholarly pursuits have centered on the gender dynamics of global conflict. Her books, including ‘Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War’ (2013) and ‘Gender War and Conflict’ (2014), provide a comprehensive feminist lens through which to understand the complexities of war and its impact on women. Sjoberg’s work contributes significantly to the ongoing dialogue surrounding gender, war, and conflict within the field of International Relations.

Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986):

Simone de Beauvoir, a philosophical luminary, made seminal contributions with her work ‘The Second Sex’ (1949), challenging societal norms and asserting that “women are not born but made.” Her profound insights into the construction of gender roles laid the foundation for feminist philosophy, encouraging critical examination of societal expectations and gendered identities.

V. Spike Peterson:

V. Spike Peterson’s contributions extend to the realm of global political economy. In ‘A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy’ (2003), Peterson proposes a Reproductive – Productive – Virtual Economies Model (RPV Model), which integrates reproductive, productive, and virtual economies. This model offers a comprehensive framework to gain deeper insights into the contemporary complexities of global political economy, showcasing Peterson’s innovative approach to feminist analysis.


The feminist perspective in International Relations serves as a catalyst for change, unveiling the gender dynamics that have long been ingrained in the discipline. By challenging established norms, feminists strive to foster a more inclusive and equitable international political landscape. As the world continues to evolve, embracing diverse perspectives is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of global affairs.

Latest articles

Leave a Comment

You cannot copy content of this page